I have been re-reading John Scalzi's Old Man's War series. Science Fiction is not my favorite genre. If not for the books Big Cuter recommends I wouldn't read it at all. It's too much science and the fiction gets lost for me in the details, most of which I don't understand at all.
Ender's Game came to me after he read it in middle school. It's still one of his important books (along with Plato's Republic.... yes, I know.....), and for good reason. It opened my eyes to the possibilities within the genre, but nothing grabbed me that way until I found John Scalzi.
I saw him at the Tucson Festival of Books in March and picked up the books soon thereafter. They are filled with many types of sentient beings. Some are asteroids. Some are room sized bugs with arms designed for slashing. Some are human, although some of those humans are green, with self repairing bodies.
Not all of them have consciousness.
What that meant was hard for me to grasp, and Scalzi seems to recognize that some of us might have issues. Several times the story takes a little leap backwards, with someone/thing explains the gift of consciousness once again. Two of the major characters were part of a race that was sentient but had no notion of being individuals.
I'm still grappling with it.
So, apparently is the robotics community.
NPR told me about robots that can be trained to make my bed, empty my dishwasher, wash and fold the laundry.... the list went on. The question facing the designers is not Can they be taught to figure other things out on their own? but Should we really be creating thinking robots?
And there I was, back trying to figure out if the robot thinks but doesn't recognize another robot as a similar but distinct being does it lack consciousness? And is that a good thing or a bad thing?
This post has taken a long time to write, because my brain is off on tangent after tangent, trying to figure it out. I'm having a hard time finding the words. That's not a bad thing. I love it when a book captivates me this way.


