We felt like that tree in the forest, falling to the ground, wondering if anyone was hearing the sound. The local president of NOW, the leaders of LUCHA, the OFA usual suspects, and I were gathered in the courtyard of the YWCA yesterday morning, ready to present our words and our passion to the media assembled before us.
Unfortunately, nobody came.
That didn't stop us. We spoke, a video recording was made, photos were taken. Uploading and sharing and registering the event took place on a variety of platforms. It was all very 21st century. It happened, even though no one was there to hear it.
For the record, here's what I said:
Just
because you can, doesn't mean you should.
For
what legitimate purpose does one need dozens of assault rifles? You
can't buy large quantities of fertilizer without triggering an alert.
You can't buy Sudafed without the purchase being recorded. An
assault rifle is at least as dangerous as cold medicine.
Do you
have them for defense? I've seen the police and the military up
close and personal, armed and ready to protect me. Believe me, if
the Marines want you, you are toast, and I don't care how many
civilians with how many rounds of armor piercing ammo you have.
Armor
Piercing Ammo. Are we really having this conversation?
Just
because you can doesn't mean you should.
The
Hearing Protection Act worries about the health and wellbeing of the
shooters who, poor dears, are forced to wear ear muffs to protect
themselves from the sounds of their sport. Protections in sports are
well known – my son played lacrosse, I still have his pads. My
daughter played soccer; the refs knocked on her shin guards before
every game. Your sport has risks – buy the equipment to keep you
safe.
And if
you are loooking at your gun as a tool, then wear protective gear,
just like a welder wears a mask.
The
Capitol Police were not watching the game when they heard the
shooting. They heard the shooting and came running. If there were
suppressors on those guns I wonder how many more Republicans would
have spent their summers in the hospital, alongside Congressman Scalise.
I get
it. Who will make the list? I came of age during Nixon's Enemies
List. I understand the fear. But, how about a list made by the
Army? If the army disqualifies an individual because he does not
have the mental stability to wield a weapon alongside others who are
being trained to kill, then why shouldn't the rest of us be just as
protected from this person as his squad mates? I asked Rep McSally
this question in an op ed in the Arizona Daily Star several months ago; she called
me a liar in her telephone town hall a few days later. She accused
me of purveying misrepresentations and false statements. Well, Ms McSally, the only
facts in the piece were your votes; the rest was my opinion that you
have a special responsibility to this particular district, with our
particular history, to represent us.......not to
Rubber Stamp President Trump's agenda.
We elected you. We want you
to represent all of us.
You are not talking to the wind although you (and the rest of us) may feel that way. We are saying what must be said...and you do it beautifully and forcefully. I'm a rank amateur, but I say it anyway in order to sleep at night and feel somewhat better for not just silently accepting the current environment. Amen to your post.
ReplyDeleteWhy, thank you, Margie! It must be said, if only to be able to tell our heirs that we tried.
Deletea/b